🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has argued that federal officials at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by mobilizing troops from California.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”