🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, further states are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies take a more measured stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that states internationally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.